Understanding crypto as its own asset class

While Bitcoin has been viewed as a replacement for fiat currencies or a digital alternative to gold, it’s becoming clear that cryptocurrencies are something else entirely.

Bitcoin has arguably been the asset of the century thus far — not only due to its spectacular financial performance but also because of the broader crypto industry and technological ecosystem it has fostered through blockchain innovation. Nevertheless, cryptocurrencies, and Bitcoin in particular, were often dismissed until recently as technological curiosities or niche financial instruments. This perception is now rapidly changing.

Why has such a revolutionary innovation and high-performing asset been met with persistent skepticism? The answer lies in Bitcoin’s origins. It was conceived as a replacement for the traditional financial system and, more fundamentally, for fiat money itself. Its foundational characteristics, reinforced by a unique technology, enabled early adopters to champion its advantages on a global scale. Yet these same characteristics (and the anti-establishment narrative promoted by its followers) also provoked resistance from financial institutions, regulators and governments.

Continue reading with one of our memberships:

  • Annual membership

    ✔️ Unlimited access for one year
    ✔️ Renews automatically unless canceled

    $ 250.00 / year
  • Monthly membership

    ✔️ One month of unlimited access
    ✔️ Renews automatically unless canceled

    $ 23.50 / month

Sign in

If you are already a member, sign in to view this post.

Author

  • Alan G. Futerman is an economist, co-founder and CFO at Lulubit, a cryptocurrency exchange in Central America. His work has been featured in journals such as International Journal of Finance & Economics, and in publications such as The Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. He co authored “Commodities as an Asset Class” (Palgrave Macmillan, 2022) with Ivo A. Sarjanovic.

    View all posts